Hard-difficulty flashcards covering advanced fallacies, complex evidence evaluation, and sophisticated argument construction techniques for the A-Level Thinking Skills exam.
20 cards
Front
Amphiboly (Syntactic Ambiguity)
Back
A fallacy where a grammatical structure or sentence phrasing allows for multiple interpretations. Unlike equivocation (which relies on a word having multiple meanings), amphiboly relies on the poor construction of the sentence itself to mislead the audience. > **Example:** 'I saw the man with the telescope.' (Did I use the telescope, or did the man have it?)
Front
Tu Quoque ('You Too')
Back
A type of Ad Hominem fallacy where one attempts to discredit an opponent's argument by asserting the opponent's failure to act consistently with that argument. It is a deflection tactic that does not address the truth or falsity of the original claim. > **Real-world:** A smoker dismissing a doctor's advice to quit because the doctor smokes.
Front
The Base Rate Fallacy
Back
An error in reasoning where specific information (e.g., individuating data) is favored over general statistical information (base rates). It often occurs when evaluating the probability of an event under uncertain conditions. > **Math Example:** Ignoring the fact that a disease affects only 0.1% of the population, while focusing solely on a 90% accurate test result, leading to a vastly overestimated risk.
Front
Is-Ought Gap (Hume's Guillotine)
Back
The principle that one cannot derive prescriptive statements (what ought to be) from descriptive statements (what is) without a bridging premise. A factual claim about the state of the world does not logically necessitate a specific moral action unless one assumes a value system. > [!NOTE] Moving from 'X is natural' to 'X is good' is a fallacy known as the Appeal to Nature.
Front
Red Herring
Back
A diversionary tactic that introduces an irrelevant topic to divert attention from the original issue. Unlike the Straw Man (which distorts the argument), a Red Herring simply abandons the argument to chase a distraction. > **Context:** Often used in political debates to avoid answering difficult questions.
Sign up to access the full deck with spaced repetition review.
Sign Up — Free