AP English Language - Advanced Rhetorical Analysis

Front

Synecdoche vs. Metonymy

Back

Synecdoche uses a part to represent the whole (e.g., 'wheels' for car). Metonymy uses an associated concept to represent another (e.g., 'the crown' for the king). On the AP exam, identifying this distinction shows precise stylistic analysis.

Front

Elegant Variation / Synonymia

Back

The repetition of a concept using different words for emphasis or to avoid monotony. Unlike simple redundancy, this device is often used to persuade the audience by restating a claim in increasingly favorable terms.

Front

Begging the Question (Circular Reasoning)

Back

A logical fallacy where the claim is assumed to be true and is then used as evidence to support the claim itself. In FRQs, identify this as a flaw in reasoning rather than a rhetorical strength.

Front

Sentential Adverbs

Back

Words or phrases that modify an entire sentence rather than a single word, often used to show a transition or attitude (e.g., “however,” “therefore,” “consequently”). In formal AP English writing, they are typically followed by a comma.

Front

Exordium

Back

The introductory part of a discourse or argument, intended to prepare the audience for the main discussion. In classical rhetoric, this is where the speaker establishes their credibility (ethos) and the audience's goodwill.