Master mid-level logical reasoning concepts including conditional logic, argument structures, and common flaws for the LSAT.
20 cards
Front
What is the difference between a necessary assumption and a sufficient assumption?
Back
A **Sufficient Assumption** guarantees the conclusion is true (if true, conclusion must follow). A **Necessary Assumption** is required for the argument to hold (if negated, the argument fails). Sufficient assumptions are often 'stronger' or more absolute than necessary ones.
Front
Contrapositive
Back
A logically equivalent statement formed by negating and reversing a conditional statement. If the original is 'If A, then B' (A -> B), the contrapositive is 'If not B, then not A' (/B -> /A). The contrapositive has the same truth value as the original statement.
Front
Identify the flaw: 'Mistaking Necessary for Sufficient'
Back
To recognize or establish the identity of someone or something. From Latin idem meaning “the same,” via Late Latin identificare (“to make identical”), related to identitas (“identity”).
Front
What is the 'Main Point' or 'Main Conclusion' of an argument?
Back
The primary claim the author is trying to establish. It is often signaled by words like 'therefore,' 'thus,' 'hence,' or 'consequently.' Everything else in the passage serves as premises or background information to support this main point.
Front
Identify the flaw: 'Circular Reasoning'
Back
To recognize or establish the identity of someone or something. From Latin idem meaning “the same,” via Late Latin identificare (“to make identical”), related to identitas (“identity”).
Sign up to access the full deck with spaced repetition review.
Sign Up — Free